- 公共英語考試pets5寫作 推薦度：
- 相關推薦
公共英語pets5寫作范文2017
業(yè)精于勤，荒于嬉;行成于思，毀于隨。以下百分網(wǎng)小編整理的公共英語pets5寫作范文，希望對大家有所幫助，更多信息請關注應屆畢業(yè)生網(wǎng)!
Since the 1960s, debates have been fueled on the ideal means of communication. Some observers, free lancers and columnists in particular, often emphasize that the more friends one has on line, the fewer one has in his life. However, through decades of practice and observation, it turns out that their statement has many restrictions.
Admittedly, the idea held by those observers does contain an element of truth. For example, along with the computer boom, Internet, the gem of twentieth century scientific technology, is playing an increasingly important role in the means of communication. But these arguers tend to ignore two other essential aspects. First, they fail to take into account the possibility that a variety of technical devices are available. As a result, people can resort to telephones or faxes to maintain a more intimate human relationship. In this sense, the popularity of Internet is not always synonymous to the emotional isolations between people. Second, the arguers’ assertion doesn’t provide sufficient data to narrow down the exact number of computer users who seldom contact their parents or colleagues. Therefore, any further conclusion addressing the problem must be based on thorough investigation. As a matter of fact, dinner parties, celebrating parties as well as other social activities always successfully bring people together. In this respect, the upsurge of electric contact is not the sole hallmark of the decrease of closed friends.Given reasons above, the argument above, under a careful examination, turns out to be groundless in its hasty conclusion.
In conclusion, the arguers’ evidence lends little credible support to their claim. To persuade people that the more friends one has on line, the fewer friends one has in his life, the arguers would need to provide clear evidence, sufficient data and thorough cost-benefit analysis of alternatives.(297 words)
譯文：
自1960年代以來,爭論一直在推動理想的通訊手段。一些觀察人士,特別是自由槍騎兵和專欄作家,經(jīng)常強調(diào)的更多的朋友,更少的人在他的生活中。然而,通過幾十年的實踐和觀察,事實證明,他們的聲明有許多限制。
誠然,這些觀察人士持有的想法并包含一個元素的真理。例如,隨著計算機的繁榮,互聯(lián)網(wǎng),二十世紀科學技術的寶石,發(fā)揮著日益重要的角色的溝通方式。但這些爭論者傾向于忽視其他兩個基本方面。首先,他們沒有考慮各種技術設備的可能性。因此,人們可以采取電話或傳真來維持一個更親密的人際關系。從這個意義上說,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的普及并不總是代表人與人之間情感的分解動作。第二,辯論者的論斷沒有提供足夠的數(shù)據(jù)來縮小計算機用戶的確切數(shù)字很少接觸他們的父母或同事。因此,任何進一步的結論解決問題必須基于徹底的調(diào)查。事實上,宴會,慶祝聚會以及其他社會活動總是成功地把人們團結在一起。在這方面,電接觸的高潮并不是唯一的標志的減少封閉的朋友。鑒于以上原因,上面的論點,在仔細檢查下,草率的結論被證明是毫無根據(jù)的。
總之,辯論者的證據(jù)卻很少可信支持他們的說法。要說服人們,更多的朋友,朋友越少人在他的生活中,辯論者需要提供明確的證據(jù),足夠的數(shù)據(jù)和徹底的替代品的成本效益分析。
【公共英語pets5寫作】相關文章：
2016年公共英語考試pets5寫作范文09-02
公共英語PETS5閱讀理解題型解析09-14
2023公共英語五級pets5備考經(jīng)驗分享08-14
公共英語等級考試pets5詞匯選項試題08-25
2015年公共英語pets5聽力考試技巧07-16