精彩開場白范文
安全是甚么?安全就是愛惜和保護人的生命不受侵害。安全是一種尊嚴，它既是對他人的尊重，也是對自己的尊重。安全是一種文明，是時代的進步、社會的發(fā)展和人的整體素質的進步。安全是人生幸福的港灣。有了安全，才有歡樂和暖和，有了安全，才會具有美麗的人生。
安全，是多么美好的字眼，猶如溫馨一樣，讓人倍感親切、踏實。我的中國夢征文然而，在現實生活中，卻經常發(fā)生很多觸目驚心的事故。事故的發(fā)生有客觀的緣由，但更多的卻是人為的緣由而釀成的。不重視安全宣傳，不重視安全生產，不重視安全操縱，使很多少生靈涂炭，多少幸福家庭慘遭不幸。
安全靠甚么?安全靠責任心，在工作的每分鐘、每秒鐘，安全隱患隨時都可能像殘暴的野獸張開血盆大口，盯著我們脆弱的肉體，麻痹我們的神經。只有強化安全意識，增強責任心，安全生產才不受要挾，只有增強責任心，安全才有保障，生命才會美麗。
因此，把安全“印”在心中，是我們必須堅守的神圣職責。把安全印在心中，時刻繃緊安全這根弦，讓安全生產、安全經營、安全工作切實落實到實處，從身邊的小事抓起，把一切隱患消滅在可能出現的萌芽之前，中國夢征文讓我們的生產、經營和各項工作都處于一個安全的環(huán)境當中，讓我們的生活布滿更多的笑臉和歡樂。
端午節(jié)精彩開場白范文
大家好，今天是一年一度的端午佳節(jié)，在這里我代表xx-xx向大家表示節(jié)日的祝福。
大約在公元前三四零年的戰(zhàn)國時代，屈原出生在楚國的一個貴族家庭里。他青年時代就有著出色的才干，踏進楚國朝廷不久，便受到賞識，但是屈原實行政治改革的主張始終不能實現，終于被削職流放出去。他在流放途中，走遍了現在湖南、湖北的許多地方，寫下了許多充滿愛國憂民感情的詩篇。后來楚國亡了，屈原心裹有說不出的痛苦，便來到泊羅江邊，抱起一塊石頭，縱身投入江里自盡了。
傳說屈原死后，楚國百姓哀痛異常，紛紛涌到汨羅江邊去憑吊屈原。漁夫們劃起船只，在江上來回打撈他的真身。有位漁夫拿出為屈原準備的飯團、雞蛋等食物，“撲通、撲通”地丟進江里，說是讓魚龍蝦蟹吃飽了，就不會去咬屈大夫的身體了。人們見后紛紛仿效。一位老醫(yī)師則拿來一壇雄黃酒倒進江里，說是要藥暈蛟龍水獸，以免傷害屈大夫。后來為怕飯團為蛟龍所食，人們想出用楝樹葉包飯，外纏彩絲，發(fā)展成棕子。
以后，在每年的五月初五，就有了龍舟競渡、吃粽子、喝雄黃酒的風俗;以此來紀念愛國詩人屈原。
畢業(yè)生論文答辯英語精彩開場白范文
尊敬的各位老師：
大家上午好!
我叫×××，本次論文指導老師是×××老師，我選的畢業(yè)論文題目是《提升浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力的對策研究》，下面我先匯報一下自己選擇這篇論文的動機以及論文選題背景、基本寫作思路、理論與實踐意義。
先來陳述一下我的寫作動機。我來自臺州，在沒寫這篇論文之前我僅知道臺州各地存在生產相同產品的特色鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)，比較熟悉的有臨海的太平洋彩燈城、臺州的的服裝機械、玉環(huán)的閥門等等，根據2015年底的統(tǒng)計數據，其中閥門水泵占全國出口的60%以上，縫紉機和電動裁剪機在國際上占有70%的市場份額等等。而浙江，眾所周知是一個貿易大省，我想出口與產業(yè)集群應該有醒目的聯系，所以，我就選擇了《提升浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力的對策研究》，一方面是希望通過這篇論文能讓自己更加清楚的了解浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群的分布、現狀及國際競爭力，二則因為自己屬于國貿專業(yè)，也希望以后能從我省的優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群中挖掘更多的商機，為自己的未來作些理論的鋪墊。
其次，我要陳述的是本篇論文的主要論點及結構。雖然這篇論文的選題有點長，但我覺得中心還是應該扣在最后的幾個字上，即“集群競爭力的對策分析”。 所謂“產業(yè)集群”，是指在某一產業(yè)的上下游企業(yè)在一定區(qū)域內大量集聚，形成了競爭優(yōu)勢的經濟群落。北京大學教授王緝慈在論壇中指出，提高出口競爭力的關鍵是發(fā)展富有特色的產業(yè)集群，力避產業(yè)集群的同質性的重復建設。因此，我的論文從浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群的發(fā)展現狀和主要特點著手，力求尋找到我省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群具有優(yōu)勢的軟硬件基礎。我總結出來的幾點是規(guī)模喜人、產業(yè)結構合理、產品分工細致、出口競爭優(yōu)勢顯著等。
在論證浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力及其競爭優(yōu)勢的時候，我主要分析浙江省產業(yè)集群的幾個關系，比如企業(yè)集聚與生產效率、國際競爭力的關系，集群競爭力與競爭壓力、創(chuàng)新能力的關系，“區(qū)位品牌”與集群競爭力的聯系等。而出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力的決定因素也常規(guī)的從國家層面、集群層面、企業(yè)層面 “先大角度再小口徑”地分析。
這篇大學生畢業(yè)論文對浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力指標分析也主要集中在第三部分，這也是我對策研究的理論根據。其中包括集群占浙江省近幾年六成左右的主要經濟指標----浙江省03~06年的進出口額，浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群中主要企業(yè)在各地區(qū)的分布情況，例舉溫州民營中小企業(yè)對海外市場進入方式偏好，而競爭力指標也主要圍繞貿易競爭力指標(tc指數)，出口分散度等進行論述。并進一步提出浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力的制約因素。這些都是浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力的對策提出的基礎。
論文的重心也是通過以上的分析來給出提升浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力的對策。我借鑒了大學經濟類科目的主要歸納方法，分別從政府、企業(yè)、行業(yè)協(xié)會三個角度來提出相應的對策。也可以說是宏觀與微觀對策的雙重分析來應答如何提升浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力。
在寫完這篇論文的時候，自己感覺條理上還不是很嚴謹，出現了一些觀點的重復，對一些具體數據的收集還有許多不足，使得這篇論文在對浙江省出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群競爭力的的思考還停留在比較粗淺的層面，不論在理論方面，還是在實踐方面都有許多問題需要繼續(xù)進行深入、細致地探索。但也因為通過寫這篇論文使我對浙江的出口優(yōu)勢產業(yè)集群的分布、產業(yè)集群狀況及出口總體概況有了大致的了解，大學本專業(yè)所學的部分知識也重新被認識與肯定，因此也可以說一篇論文使我受益匪淺。
最后，懇請各位老師進行批評指正，謝謝大家!
英文精彩演講稿開場白集錦
opening statement
mr. chairman, senator thurmond, members of the committee, my name is anita f. hill, and i am a professor of law at the university of oklahoma. i was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in 1956. i am the youngest of 13 children. i had my early education in okmulgee county. my father, albert hill, is a farmer in that area. my mother's name is irma hill. she is also a farmer and a housewife.
my childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents. i was reared in a religious atmosphere in the baptist faith, and i have been a member of the antioch baptist church in tulsa, oklahoma, since 1983. it is a very warm part of my life at the present time.
for my undergraduate work, i went to oklahoma state university and graduated from there in 1977. i am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.
i graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the yale law school, where i received my jd degree in 1980. upon graduation from law school, i became a practicing lawyer with the washington, dc, firm of ward, hardraker, and ross.
in 1981, i was introduced to now judge thomas by a mutual friend. judge thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if i would be interested in working with him. he was, in fact, appointed as assistant secretary of education for civil rights. after he had taken that post, he asked if i would become his assistant, and i accepted that position.
in my early period there, i had two major projects. the first was an article i wrote for judge thomas' signature on the education of minority students. the second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that office.
during this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was positive. i had a good deal of responsibility and independence. i thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment. after approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.
what happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things -- experiences of my life. it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleepless number -- a great number of sleepless nights that i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.
i declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working relationship. i had a normal social life with other men outside of the office. i believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised. i was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.
i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions. however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions. he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him. these incidents took place in his office or mine. they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.
my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuss se-x. on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria. after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of se-xual matters.
his conversations were very vivid. he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having se-x with animals and films showing group se-x or rape scenes. he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various se-x acts. on several occasions, thomas told me graphically of his own se-xual prowess.
because i was extremely uncomfortable talking about se-x with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these subjects. i would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonse-xual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs. my efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.
throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements. my reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations. this was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of education -- or office for civil rights.
during the latter part of my time at the department of education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior ended. i began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional one.
when judge thomas was made chair of the eeoc, i needed to face the question of whether to go with him. i was asked to do so, and i did. the work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the se-xual overtures which had so troubled me had ended. i also faced the realistic fact that i had no alternative job. while i might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, i was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that field. moreover, the department of education itself was a dubious venture. president reagan was seeking to abolish the entire department.
for my first months at the eeoc, where i continued to be an assistant to judge thomas, there were no se-xual conversations or overtures. however, during the fall and winter of 1982, these began again. the comments were random and ranged from pressing me about why i didn't go out with him to remarks about my personal appearance. i remember his saying that some day i would have to tell him the real reason that i wouldn't go out with him.
he began to show displeasure in his tone and voice and his demeanor and his continued pressure for an explanation. he commented on what i was wearing in terms of whether it made me more or less se-xually attractive. the incidents occurred in his inner office at the eeoc.
one of the oddest episodes i remember was an occasion in which thomas was drinking a coke in his office. he got up from the table at which we were working, went over to his desk to get the coke, looked at the can and asked, "who has pubic hair on my coke?" on other occasions, he referred to the size of his own penis as being larger than normal, and he also spoke on some occasions of the pleasures he had given to women with oral se-x.
at this point, late 1982, i began to feel severe stress on the job. i began to be concerned that clarence thomas might take out his anger with me by degrading me or not giving me important assignments. i also thought that he might find an excuse for dismissing me.
in january of 1983, i began looking for another job. i was handicapped because i feared that, if he found out, he might make it difficult for me to find other employment and i might be dismissed from the job i had. another factor that made my search more difficult was that there was a period -- this was during a period of a hiring freeze in the government. in february of 1983, i was hospitalized for five days on an emergency basis for acute stomach pain which i attributed to stress on the job.
once out of the hospital, i became more committed to find other employment and sought further to minimize my contact with thomas. this became easier when allison duncan (sp) became office director, because most of my work was then funneled through her and i had contact with clarence thomas mostly in staff meetings.
in the spring of 1983, an opportunity to teach at oral roberts university opened up. i participated in a seminar -- taught an afternoon session and seminar at oral roberts university. the dean of the university saw me teaching and inquired as to whether i would be interested in furthering -- pursuing a career in teaching, beginning at oral roberts university. i agreed to take the job in large part because of my desire to escape the pressures i felt at the eeoc due to judge thomas.
when i informed him that i was leaving in july, i recall that his response was that now i would no longer have an excuse for not going out with him. i told him that i still preferred not to do so. at some time after that meeting, he asked if he could take me to dinner at the end of the term. when i declined, he assured me that the dinner was a professional courtesy only and not a social invitation. i reluctantly agreed to accept that invitation, but only if it was at the every end of a working day.
on, as i recall, the last day of my employment at the eeoc in the summer of 1983, i did have dinner with clarence thomas. we went directly from work to a restaurant near the office. we talked about the work i had done, both at education and at the eeoc. he told me that he was pleased with all of it except for an article and speech that i had done for him while we were at the office for civil rights. finally, he made a comment that i will vividly remember. he said that if i ever told anyone of his behavior that it would ruin his career. this was not an apology, nor was it an explanation. that was his last remark about the possibility of our going out or reference to his behavior.
in july of 1983, i left washington, dc area and have had minimal contact
with judge clarence thomas since. i am of course aware from the press that some questions have been raised about conversations i had with judge clarence thomas after i left the eeoc. from 1983 until today, i have seen judge thomas only twice. on one occasion, i needed to get a reference from him, and on another he made a public appearance in tulsa.
on one occasion he called me at home and we had an inconsequential conversation. on one occasion he called me without reaching me, and i returned the call without reaching him, and nothing came of it. i have on at least three occasions, been asked to act as a conduit to him for others.
i knew his secretary, diane holt. we had worked together at both eeoc and education. there were occasions on which i spoke to her, and on some of these occasions undoubtedly i passed on some casual comment to then chairman thomas. there were a series of calls in the first three months of 1985, occasioned by a group in tulsa, which wished to have a civil rights conference. they wanted judge thomas to be the speaker and enlisted my assistance for this purpose.
i did call in january and february to no effect, and finally suggested to the person directly involved, susan cahal (ph) that she put the matter into her own hands and call directly. she did so in march of 1985. in connection with that march invitation, ms. cahal (ph) wanted conference materials for the seminar and some research was needed. i was asked to try to get the information and did attempted to do so.
there was another call about another possible conference in july of 1985. in august of 1987, i was in washington, dc and i did call diane holt. in the course of this conversation, she asked me how long i was going to be in town and i told her. it is recorded in the message as august 15. it was, in fact, august 20th. she told me about judge thomas's marriage and i did say congratulate him.
it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration that i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone except my closest friends. as i've said before these last few days have been very trying and very hard for me and it hasn't just been the last few days this week. it has actually been over a month now that i have been under the strain of this issue.
telling the world is the most difficult experience of my life, but it is very close to having to live through the experience that occasion this meeting. i may have used poor judgment early on in my relationship with this issue. i was aware, however, that telling at any point in my career could adversely affect my future career. and i did not want early on to burn all the bridges to the eeoc.
as i said, i may have used poor judgment. perhaps i should have taken angry or even militant steps, both when i was in the agency, or after i left it. but i must confess to the world that the course that i took seemed the better as well as the easier approach.
i declined any comment to newspa-pe-rs, but later when senate staff asked me about these matters i felt i had a duty to report. i have no personal vendetta against clarence thomas. i seek only to provide the committee with information which it may regard as relevant.
it would have been more comfortable to remain silent. i took no initiative to inform anyone. but when i was asked by a representative of this committee to report my experience, i felt that i had to tell the truth. i could not keep silent.
辯論賽辯手精彩開場白
i dare say. the reason why we call it “part” is all because we do he plenty of free time,to some degree. while if you do a part-time job. in that way,we benefit from what we do in part-time,thanks to the loyality,on one hand,who won’t admit it a good method to pick up,indeed. on the other hand. nevertheless,a large quantity of us choose to run a part-time job,is truly a good way to enjoy the college life,say.
the most important and meanful issue is that the relationship among your working surroudings sometimes may upset you a lot,however complicated the society is,the daily bread may be made by our own hands?
in addition,we are more independent than what we are before,you can learn how to teach all by yourself . as to the stylish and crazy thing,being a tutor, many disadvantages come flooding to us,deligence and intelligence you learn from the job,the priceless time pass by,patience,ma-ki-ng your time which is just simply used to sleep into a part-time job. then, which even lead to a slump in our study and daily life,it shows that. it is believed that most students don’t know how to use their spare time.
to begin with, however. only by this approach can we find how hard it is to gain money and exclaim what a hard time it is in the real society after conquer every problem we meet with,nothing is impossible. since when you sleep or hang out,to review your old-day lessons as wellrecenly
【精彩開場白】相關文章：
年會精彩的開場白12-04
早會精彩開場白12-07
有關年會精彩開場白12-04
年會精彩的開場白范文12-08
精彩年會主持的開場白12-10
元旦精彩的開場白12-23
精彩早會開場白范文（精選22篇）11-03
一段精彩的開場白（精選14篇）08-11
精彩的家長會開場白（精選6篇）10-18
元旦精彩的開場白15篇12-23